Untitled Document Club Relaford
Navigation Bar Rooster Talk Home Feature Relaford Renaissance Elections Lingo

Untitled Document Note from the Editor
About Us
Archives
Interns Corner
Rooster Talk
Write for Relaford

Shop Relaford
Relaford Mug
Check out the Club Relaford store
to get the latest gear.

Untitled Document January 2008 Issue

Relaford Renaissance

"Good Time Charlie"
Charlie Wilson's War reveals the essence of the Nation's Capitol, but the real Charlie Wilson was the embodiment of money, power, glamour, secrecy, and gut patriosm.
By C. Todd Williamson, III
Real to Reel at Club Relaford

Universal Pictures’ Charlie Wilson’s War is following the formula of some of the more successful films of recent date; an all-star cast plus a plotline based on a true story.

The beauty of it all is that Charlie Wilson is a real man and the film’s storyline rarely delves off track of what really happened. Wilson, a powerful congressman from the Lone Star state of Texas, known as “the liberal fro Lufkin,” was a member of the influential Subcommittee on Defense Appropriations under the House Appropriations Committee.

 This subcommittee appropriated the funds for everything defense natured from CIA Black Ops to the lights in the Pentagon.  Passing what would be dubbed as “black appropriations, ” even the most covert operations needed funding.

President Reagan meeting with members of the Afghan Mujahideen (www.reagan.utexas.edu)
President Reagan meeting with members of the Afghan Mujahideen (www.reagan.utexas.edu)

The story takes place in the summer of 1980 during the Soviet-Afghan War.  By this time, the Cold War had been lingering on since 1946 and such a hot war, as the Soviet Afghan War was another battleground heating up the conflict between the Western and Communist powers.

With all the chips on the table at this point, Washington insiders weren’t even fully aware of what was going on in Afghanistan. In actuality, it was to be viewed as the next setting for a Cold War showdown, and with the help of others, Rep. Charlie Wilson was about to learn just how crucial the war would be to the goals and agendas of the Western superpowers.

The Soviets had invaded the Afghan border and any opportunity to stop the was seen as a potential victory for the U.S. Wilson, armed with a larger than life personality the size of his home state of Texas, was one of the last Cold Warrior Democrats. A one-time campaigner for the Kennedy-Johnson ticket in 1960, Wilson broke with military rules and ran for a seat in the Texas state legislature while still serving active duty.

His family helped him campaign as he won large support from the African American community, simultaneously as he carried out his military service. Wilson would be elected to the Texas State House at 27 years old.

He moved up to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1972 and immediately took to the nickname “Good Time Charlie” for his outrageous lifestyle and personality, which usually included dinner jackets, policy, and booze (whiskey to be exact).

Such outgoing policymaking skills would make it easier for Wilson to convince the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee to fork over more than $400 million to the Afghan war effort against the Soviets.

In the film, Academy

Tom Hanks as Rep Charlie Wilson and Julia Roberts as Joanne Herring (Universal Pictures)
Tom Hanks as Rep Charlie Wilson and Julia Roberts as Joanne Herring
(Universal Pictures)

Award © winner Tom Hanks portrays the former congressman and Academy Award © winner Julia Roberts is cast as Joanne Herring, the Houston socialite and habitual spouse of Texas oil tycoons.

Herring, alive and kicking in the Houston social scene still appears as a reflection of the Texas beauty that she once was. The one time local talk show host played a huge roll in assisting Rep. Wilson in his quest to convince other members of Congress to financially aid Afghan fighters against the Soviet military.

But even with the encouragement and prodding of a beautiful woman, the toughest aspect of the appropriations operation was making sure that the weapons and other armaments sent to the Afghan Mujahideen rebel group could not be traced back to the United States. 

But what was Wilson’s overall motivation?  In a nutshell, it was destroying communism, deep patriotism, and an attraction to support the cause of the underdog.

With his repeated accommodations in support of the Afghan Mujahideen, Wilson was the mastermind behind the funding of an entire war. But several questions arise. What effect does Wilson’s effort have on today’s situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan?

With the large sums of money and weapons poured into not only the Soviet Afghan War, but also other quests such as support for the Somoza government in Nicaragua, such aid would later fall into the hands of what would become today’s terrorist. The U.S. would arm future foes such as Osama bin Laden and deem them “freedom fighters” in the defense of liberty. This effort was fueled in the name of winning the Cold War against the Soviets.

Civil Rights leaders Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and A. Phillip
Tom Hanks as Rep Charlie Wilson and Julia Roberts as Joanne Herring
(Universal Pictures)

Many of these fighters have since joined the ranks of Al-Qaeda, who in recent days have been contained as well as strengthened by the Musharraf administration, fueling rumors of the terrorist groups possible involvement in the untimely assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto last month.

Could Wilson’s tactics be successfully carried out today? According to John Fund of The Huffington Post, such events are not likely to occur today. In his blog entry of December 28, 2007, “Why Charlie Wilson's War Couldn't Happen Today,” Fund said, “Nothing like the Afghan operation could survive today's poisonous Washington atmosphere.”

Fund added, “House Speaker Tip O'Neill, grateful for Mr. Wilson's stalwart support, gave him a long leash. Other House Democrats, intent on blocking Reagan White House support for the Nicaraguan Contras, were happy to let Mr. Wilson have his way in a far-off land to bolster their own anti-Communist credentials.”

Such an all out funding effort for war is highly unlikely to arise from liberal Democrats. Their crown jewel campaign initiative to end the current war in Iraq continues to be their toughest battle as the majority on Capitol Hill. Besides, Nancy Pelosi would be highly reluctant to trust any wild Texan at the driver seat of a war in the Middle-East war, regardless of party.

Send comments about this article to info@clubrelaford.com

>>Back to Archives


Untitled Document

Emily King: East Side Story
....................................................................................................................
Home   ::  About Us   ::  Archives  ::  Advertising  ::  Contact Us
© 2007 Club Relaford. All rights reserved.
Shalimar Media Group